← Search

Michelle Winterich

Melbourne, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 90W–40L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Michelle Winterich to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history130 matches
W
2026-07-27 · EFSC - Leiter · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jacqueline Frank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-25 · Kiwanis - Press · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with DeAnna Nolting
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · EFSC - Leiter · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Xu Sue Huang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-06 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-04 · Kiwanis - Press · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sherry Houston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-18 · EFSC - Leiter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Failla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · with Gisela Alcalde championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · with Becky Press championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · with Ligia Moss championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
Dana Saunders / Donna Paternoster
2026-04-27 · EFSC - Leiter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Failla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-19 · EFSC - Leiter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Failla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-16 · EFSC - Leiter · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Failla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
63.8%
30W–17L · 60.3% of games
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.5% of games
6.5
87.5%
28W–4L · 63.3% of games
7.0
100%
6W–0L · 64.7% of games
7.5
60%
9W–6L · 55.7% of games
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 63.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
27 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal