← Search

Melissa Vickers

— year-end
51 matches · 27W–24L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Melissa Vickers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
L
Jennifer Oglesby / Susan Douglas
2026-08-13 · Desoto - Woods · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cuc Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-10 · RCCB - Vickers · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michele Heyn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-09 · Desoto - Woods · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samantha Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-03 · RCCB - Vickers · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brittany Reiter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · Desoto - Woods · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Lutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
DeAnna Nolting / Michelle Winterich
2026-06-25 · RCCB - Vickers · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brittany Reiter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-21 · Desoto - Woods · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tee Wells
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · Desoto - Woods · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Propst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-12 · RCCB - Vickers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rick Tarquinio mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · Desoto - Woods · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Lutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-05-26 · RCCB - Vickers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rick Tarquinio mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
Dana Saunders / Danielle Hyatt
2026-05-18 · RCCB - Vickers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brittany Reiter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
Teams35 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 63% of games
3.5
35%
7W–13L · 44.7% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
100%
5W–0L · 83.3% of games
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 51.8% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
14 matches
#1 Singles
24%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer