← Search

Mary Failla

— year-end
100 matches · 65W–35L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Mary Failla to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
W
2026-08-24 · Fee - Rouveyrol · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Rouveyrol
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-16 · EFSC - Brunkala · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julia Tulloch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-07-02 · EFSC - Brunkala · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shelly Deater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-10 · EFSC - Leiter · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-04 · EFSC - Brunkala · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Terri Dillon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
Marie Forte / Jenny Mullowney
2026-05-28 · EFSC - Brunkala · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Terri Dillon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-18 · EFSC - Leiter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Winterich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · with Linda Carrillo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · with Xu Sue Huang championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
Dana Saunders / Donna Paternoster
2026-04-27 · EFSC - Leiter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Winterich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-19 · EFSC - Leiter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Winterich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-16 · EFSC - Leiter · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Winterich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Teams35 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
82.6%
19W–4L · 59.3% of games
3.5
51.9%
14W–13L · 45.7% of games
6.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
53.8%
14W–12L · 52.1% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 65.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
24 matches
#1 Singles
15%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer