← Search

Tanya Conrad

— year-end
78 matches · 39W–39L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Tanya Conrad to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
L
2025-07-21 · Ivory Ridge-Langston · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katy Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-06-30 · Ivory Ridge-Langston · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jen Langston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-06-23 · Ivory Ridge-Langston · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jen Langston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-06-16 · Ivory Ridge-Langston · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Natalie Griffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2025-05-12 · Ivory Ridge-Langston · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Natalie Griffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-05-05 · Ivory Ridge-Langston · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christy Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2025-04-28 · Ivory Ridge-Langston · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jen Langston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-04-14 · Ivory Ridge-Langston · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tricia Sederberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-07 · Ivory Ridge-Langston · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Natalie Griffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2024-08-05 · Ivory Ridge-Conrad/Owens · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Natalie Griffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2024-07-22 · Ivory Ridge-Conrad/Owens · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jen Langston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2024-07-15 · Ivory Ridge-Conrad/Owens · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kat Fuller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Teams18 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.5
50.7%
37W–36L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
17 matches
#2 Female Doubles
4%
3 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams