← Search

Heidi Gordon

Salt Lake City, UT
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
199 matches · 100W–99L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Heidi Gordon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history199 matches
L
2026-08-21 · RL- Berg · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brigham Berg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tracey Valentine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Sterbenz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Sterbenz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christina Eischeid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Sterbenz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Diana Granger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Patrice Duvernay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-06-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brook Vietor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Sterbenz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Walzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Walzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
35.3%
6W–11L · 44.7% of games
4.5
58.3%
67W–48L · 51.9% of games
5.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 51.6% of games
8.5mixed
40%
8W–12L · 46.1% of games
9.0mixed
34.6%
9W–17L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
46 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer