← Search

Jessica Olsen

North Salt Lake, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
190 matches · 89W–101L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jessica Olsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history190 matches
W
2026-09-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Cahoon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Trisha Cutrer / Amy Black
2026-08-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa Despain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathy Miller-Rees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki Mower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Halls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Bott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Sherree Greenhalgh / Sunshine Torczon
2026-07-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathy Miller-Rees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenni Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Bott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Halls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
49.2%
65W–67L · 50% of games
4.5
42.3%
22W–30L · 47.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
31 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova