← Search

Kathleen Martin

— year-end
216 matches · 118W–98L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kathleen Martin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history216 matches
L
2026-05-14 · Olympic 2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Houck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-07 · Olympic 2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Dick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
Christine Mitchell / Pamela Smith
2026-04-30 · Olympic 2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Houck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-5, 0-1
W
Alison Scott / Sarah Shaffer
2026-04-23 · Olympic 2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Houck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-19 · Olympic 2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Houck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-19 · Olympic 2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Tilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-12 · Olympic 2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Houck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-05 · Olympic 2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Blythe Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-10-30 · Olympic 2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Dick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-5
L
2025-10-16 · Olympic 2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Dick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
Nancy Jones / Diane Crawford
2025-10-09 · Olympic 2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Blythe Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-08 · Olympic 2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Dick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Teams35 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
61.5%
96W–60L · 51.7% of games
6.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 54.3% of games
7.0
27.6%
8W–21L · 40.2% of games
7.5
40%
6W–9L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
74 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
66 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams