← Search

Stephanie Demers

— year-end
248 matches · 91W–157L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Demers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history248 matches
W
2026-07-16 · NACC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Miriello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-09 · NACC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Reem Ghanem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · NACC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Caroline Cohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-6
W
2026-06-04 · NACC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Reem Ghanem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-5
W
2026-05-14 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Theresa Donahue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-05-11 · Wickertree · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Logan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-03 · Scarborough · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theresa Donahue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-30 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jayne Eichenseer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-27 · Wickertree · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wendy Bruss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · Wickertree 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Kate Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-23 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gena Merkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
Elizabeth Long / Cecelia Ko
2026-04-19 · Scarborough · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Starin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Teams62 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
39.6%
59W–90L · 46.5% of games
4.0
18.4%
7W–31L · 36.6% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 66.3% of games
7.0
27.8%
5W–13L · 45.6% of games
7.5
42.1%
16W–22L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
101 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
68 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams