← Search

Victoria Wheeler

— year-end
213 matches · 121W–92L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Victoria Wheeler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history213 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Moore-Wheeler (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-09-12 · Fry/Hannigan · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Fry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-09 · Kellogg/Grassle · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-19 · Kellogg/Grassle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Jackman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-11 · Kellogg/Grassle · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Jackman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-5
W
2026-05-28 · Kellogg/Grassle · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ritika Chand Bergfeld
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-10 · Fry/Hannigan · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Schreck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-03 · Moore/Wheeler (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Shiras-Cody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · Fry/Hannigan · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Schreck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Lisa Moore / Jennifer Smith
2026-04-26 · Moore/Wheeler (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ritika Chand Bergfeld
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-25 · Fry/Hannigan · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-04-12 · Moore/Wheeler (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ritika Chand Bergfeld
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Teams39 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
70%
70W–30L · 57.7% of games
4.0
45.3%
39W–47L · 48.2% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 50.2% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
91 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
55 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams