← Search

Corinne Haywood

Durham, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
205 matches · 133W–72L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Corinne Haywood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history205 matches
W
2026-09-03 · CHaywood-DUR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chace Ogle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-23 · EMillard-DUR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelsey Mortimore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-20 · CHaywood-DUR · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jordan Wilkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-09 · EMillard-DUR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-07-23 · MLong.4.0-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vidit Desai mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · Er.Wynia18S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-19 · JRoss-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Carlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-14 · NMAC.Lowrance · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Hobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · MLong.4.0-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vidit Desai mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-23 · NMAC.Lowrance · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Hobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-21 · JRoss-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cristina Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Lina Habib / David Pierce
2026-06-18 · MLong.4.0-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vidit Desai mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
80%
4W–1L · 61.8% of games
3.5
63.6%
42W–24L · 56.6% of games
4.0
42.9%
12W–16L · 48% of games
6.5
77.3%
17W–5L · 58.2% of games
7.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 58.4% of games
3.5mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 58.5% of games
4.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 59.7% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.8% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
103 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
24 matches
#1 Singles
10%
20 matches
#2 Singles
6%
13 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe