← Search

Sheridan Meltsner

Durham, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
218 matches · 95W–123L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sheridan Meltsner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history218 matches
W
2026-08-27 · CAvery.7.5C-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melissa Fitzpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-25 · HHerndon-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meghan Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-24 · JPerry-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lynne Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-18 · HHerndon-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Mersereau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · JPerry-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Meltsner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-03 · JPerry-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lynne Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-27 · JPerry-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Meltsner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · JPerry-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Meltsner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-25 · JPerry-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Combs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-16 · JPerry-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Meltsner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · TWahlstrom-CHTC · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-04 · JPerry-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Ryan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 61.6% of games
4.0
36.5%
31W–54L · 42.8% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 43% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 53.3% of games
7.5
57.1%
20W–15L · 52.4% of games
8.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 38.2% of games
4.0mixed
38.1%
8W–13L · 50.1% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 54.9% of games
8.0mixed
52.6%
10W–9L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
42 matches
#1 Singles
9%
20 matches
#2 Singles
9%
20 matches
#3 Singles
5%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal