← Search

Stephanie Jabusch

— year-end
343 matches · 164W–179L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Jabusch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history343 matches
L
2026-09-13 · BCleveland.6.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alyssa Burke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-08 · TOC.Thio · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Victoria Thio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-01 · TOC.Thio · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shirley Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-08-26 · KF.Ellis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Michele Chambers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-25 · TOC.Thio · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jannifer Frazier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-22 · KF.Scagnelli · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Carley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · TOC.Thio · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Victoria Thio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-17 · KF.Scagnelli · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Virginia Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · KF.Scagnelli · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tara Navarro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-11 · TOC.Thio · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Victoria Thio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Corinne Haywood / Elizabeth Hunter
2026-08-09 · BCleveland.6.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marta Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-02 · BCleveland.6.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alyssa Burke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
Teams88 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
50%
2W–2L · 56.7% of games
2.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 65% of games
3.0
66.3%
69W–35L · 57.1% of games
3.5
39.1%
25W–39L · 46.1% of games
5.5
50%
7W–7L · 51.5% of games
6.5
44.2%
34W–43L · 47.3% of games
7.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 29.3% of games
3.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.8% of games
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 46% of games
7.0mixed
28%
7W–18L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
133 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
107 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
98 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert