← Search

Elyse Harris

Charlottesville, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
40 matches · 30W–10L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Elyse Harris to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
W
2026-06-09 · IND Cancienne - Overheads · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-02 · IND Cancienne - Overheads · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-17 · de Montbel - Smart Aces · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alex de Montbel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-05-09 · IND Cancienne - Overheads · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-08 · de Montbel - Smart Aces · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alex de Montbel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-03 · de Montbel - Smart Aces · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alex de Montbel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-02 · IND Cancienne - Overheads · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
Jennifer Owens / Andrew Barth
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · with Alex de Montbel championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Derek Johnson / Katherine Fluharty
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · with Alex de Montbel championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-28 · IND Cancienne - Overheads · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-26 · de Montbel - Smart Aces · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alex de Montbel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-21 · IND Cancienne - Overheads · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 55.6% of games
4.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 71.3% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 52.6% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 53.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
16 matches
#2 Singles
25%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#3 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams