← Search

Denise Mead

Stow, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 39W–42L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Denise Mead to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
W
2025-07-23 · NEO/Bissell/A65&Over6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deb Rutzky
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-07-21 · A55 6.0W LT2 Marschik · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Busch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-07-07 · A55 6.0W LT2 Marschik · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Cousino McKeen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2025-06-23 · A55 6.0W LT2 Marschik · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-18 · NEO/Bissell/A65&Over6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Myra Lakin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-16 · A55 6.0W LT2 Marschik · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Myra Lakin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-04 · NEO/Bissell/A65&Over6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Myra Lakin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-06-02 · A55 6.0W LT2 Marschik · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Marschik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-05-21 · NEO/Bissell/A65&Over6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Marschik
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-05-19 · A55 6.0W LT2 Marschik · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sharon Kimmell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-04-14 · A55 6.0W LT Burgess · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Meloy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-03-24 · A55 6.0W LT Burgess · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julia Euclide
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 62.8% of games
3.0
45.5%
15W–18L · 50.6% of games
5.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
43.6%
17W–22L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 53% of the time
#3 Doubles
53%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King