← Search

Debra Harber-Dennis

— year-end
30 matches · 19W–11L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Debra Harber-Dennis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
L
2022-06-11 · Asbell, Candace · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Hurst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2022-05-21 · Asbell, Candace · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Hurst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2022-05-14 · Asbell, Candace · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Hurst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2022-05-07 · Asbell, Candace · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Hurst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2020-03-06 · Kuegler, Debbie · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Kuegler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2020-03-01 · Palmer, Mona · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theresa Montgomery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
Laura Bluhm / Juanita Geiger
2020-02-21 · Kuegler, Debbie · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelley Sneed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
Halina Bini / Livia Steeger
2020-01-26 · Palmer, Mona · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Kehrwald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2020-01-18 · Palmer, Mona · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Foderberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2020-01-12 · Palmer, Mona · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachael Dennis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2020-01-05 · Palmer, Mona · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Shinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2019-12-15 · Palmer, Mona · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Foderberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Teams5 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
65.4%
17W–9L · 50.3% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe