← Search

Phyllis Norman

— year-end
279 matches · 216W–63L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Phyllis Norman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history279 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Fendler, Kathleen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mallory Plungkhen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-22 · Fendler, Kathleen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carmen Kowalski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-5
W
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · with Ashton Sparks championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-23 · Norman, Phyllis · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mallory Plungkhen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-02 · Norman, Phyllis · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mallory Plungkhen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Trina Kahl / Linda Johnson
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · with Carolyn Ellspermann championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-28 · Norman, Phyllis · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mallory Plungkhen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-21 · Norman, Phyllis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carolyn Ellspermann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-29 · HOA/Norman/40&over4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erin Hambrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-22 · Spielhagen/Sparks · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jill Burgdorfer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-22 · Spielhagen/Sparks · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erin Hambrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-03-14 · HOA/Norman/40&over4.5W · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jackie Stahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Teams96 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
100%
13W–0L · 68.3% of games
3.0
100%
6W–0L · 66.7% of games
3.5
81%
34W–8L · 63.1% of games
4.0
81.2%
65W–15L · 62.2% of games
4.5
72.1%
62W–24L · 56.7% of games
7.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 54.9% of games
8.0mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 58.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
103 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
95 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
78 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer