← Search

Andrea Rahal

Richmond, VA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
94 matches · 55W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Andrea Rahal to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history94 matches
L
2026-09-10 · WOCC Kelly/Blackwood · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erin Decker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-10 · CCV DeLacey · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anne Henry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-28 · CCV DeLacey · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lucy Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-27 · WOCC Kelly/Blackwood · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Morton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-08-19 · WOCC Kelly/Blackwood · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-10 · CCV DeLacey · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kimberly Brewer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · CCV Angel/Hagerty 4.5 WeekEND · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mindy Angel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-30 · CCV Angel/Hagerty 4.5 WeekEND · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-09 · CCV Angel/Hagerty 4.5 WeekEND · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-03 · CCV Angel/Hagerty 4.5 WeekEND · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-25 · CCV Angel/Hagerty 4.5 WeekEND · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laura Granger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-11 · CCV Angel/Hagerty 4.5 WeekEND · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
61.8%
34W–21L · 52.4% of games
8.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 47.9% of games
9.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
26 matches
#1 Singles
27%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
15 matches
#2 Singles
10%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova