← Search

Kim Alley

Maidens, VA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
243 matches · 127W–116L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kim Alley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history243 matches
W
2026-09-10 · TDC Wyman · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nicole Wyman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-09-04 · TDC Wyman · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nicole Wyman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-24 · TDC Wyman · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Irina Schaffernoth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-13 · TDC Wyman · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacy Lukanuski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-10 · TDC Wyman · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Irina Schaffernoth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · CCV Ray · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stacy Lukanuski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-31 · TDC Wyman · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nicole Wyman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-27 · TDC Wyman · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nicole Wyman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-25 · CCV Ray · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mary Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-09 · Rockwood Park Hall · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karolyn Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-07 · Rockwood Park Hall · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-30 · Rockwood Park Hall · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karolyn Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
60.2%
65W–43L · 53.1% of games
7.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.4% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
64.3%
18W–10L · 53.7% of games
9.0
25%
1W–3L · 37.3% of games
8.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 72.8% of games
8.5mixed
0%
0W–9L · 36.2% of games
9.0mixed
49%
24W–25L · 49.3% of games
9.5mixed
25%
4W–12L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
100 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
76 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
50 matches
#1 Singles
5%
13 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#3 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer