← Search

Emily Hudson

Beavercreek, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
214 matches · 115W–99L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Emily Hudson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history214 matches
L
Mary Miller / Katie Humphreville
2026-07-19 · KTC-Hudson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erin Armitage
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · QRRC-Linhardt · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Vitale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-18 · KTC-Beringer · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert Kastler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · KTC-Hudson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Akemon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
Rebecca Cobb / Christy Smith
2026-07-11 · QRRC-Linhardt · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Akemon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-28 · KTC-Hudson · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan Oue
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-07 · KTC-Hudson · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan Oue
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-31 · KTC-Hudson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sam Linhardt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
Meryl Hattenbach / Elizabeth Wood
2026-05-30 · QRRC-Linhardt · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Klepacz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
Kelly Scudder / Beth Brown
2026-05-23 · QRRC-Linhardt · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
Christy Smith / Terrie Wiley
2026-05-17 · QRRC-Linhardt · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teresa Sorrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-16 · QRRC-Hudson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Casey Gill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 58.2% of games
3.0
67%
63W–31L · 56.4% of games
3.5
40.9%
36W–52L · 45% of games
5.5
60%
3W–2L · 55.6% of games
6.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 50% of games
6.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
46 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
17 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer