← Search

Rob Hagelberg

— year-end
114 matches · 64W–50L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Rob Hagelberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
W
2026-08-29 · HOL-Hamid · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rizwan Hamid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-08-19 · HOL-Williamson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Chillinsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-25 · HOL-Hamid · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Lowman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-07-22 · HOL-Williamson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Chillinsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-18 · HOL-Sanford · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rahul Nair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · HOL-Sanford · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Lowman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-24 · HOL-Williamson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Williamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · HOL-Sanford · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Lowman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-14 · STC-Ritze · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tim Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-13 · HOL-Sanford · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chad Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-10 · HOL-Williamson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carl Kinnunen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-05 · HOL-Hamid · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Hawley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Teams29 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
69.7%
23W–10L · 55.8% of games
3.5
43.2%
19W–25L · 44.7% of games
6.5
80%
8W–2L · 62.3% of games
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 48.2% of games
6.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 53.8% of games
7.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 36.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
24 matches
#1 Singles
17%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
16 matches
#2 Singles
12%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe