← Search

Kelly Uhl

— year-end
256 matches · 102W–154L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kelly Uhl to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history256 matches
W
2026-08-23 · QRRC-Buerschen · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Newell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-14 · KTC-Soulati · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jayme Soulati
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-09 · SRTC-Tabrah · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sally Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · KTC-Soulati · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Teresa Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-30 · KTC-Soulati · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jayme Soulati
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Nicki Bauer / Amanda Casey
2026-06-28 · QRRC-Buerschen · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mindy Watts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
Jessica Anderson / Sonja Johannes
2026-06-20 · SRTC-Lutz · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessie Dailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
Jayme Soulati / Carolyn Smith
2026-06-18 · SRTC-Tabrah · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deborah Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-16 · KTC-Soulati · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caryn Caldwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-09 · KTC-Soulati · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Teresa Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-07 · QRRC-Buerschen · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Emily Buerschen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Megan Oue / Susan Stewart
2026-06-06 · SRTC-Lutz · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Milagros Layrisse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Teams65 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
50.6%
83W–81L · 49.4% of games
4.5
13%
7W–47L · 34.5% of games
7.5
0%
0W–5L · 28.9% of games
8.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 51.3% of games
8.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 38.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 34% of the time
#1 Singles
34%
87 matches
#2 Singles
30%
77 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova