← Search

Mindy Watts

— year-end
215 matches · 118W–97L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mindy Watts to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history215 matches
L
2026-08-16 · QRRC-Buerschen · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kirsten Gross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-13 · STC-Brann · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Colleen Duch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-14 · KTC-McClanahan · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Ooten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-07 · KTC-McClanahan · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Ooten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · KTC-McClanahan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Newell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
Nicki Bauer / Amanda Casey
2026-06-28 · QRRC-Buerschen · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kelly Uhl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-23 · KTC-McClanahan · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Shively
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-16 · KTC-McClanahan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Newell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-06-09 · KTC-McClanahan · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Ooten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
Linda Smith / Sonja Johannes
2026-06-04 · STC-Brann · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Colleen Duch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-26 · KTC-McClanahan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Hann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-09 · QRRC-McNea-Wiley · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Newell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Teams53 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
72%
54W–21L · 59.3% of games
4.5
37.5%
30W–50L · 45.8% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 54.5% of games
8.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.1% of games
8.5
40%
4W–6L · 43.5% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
61.5%
16W–10L · 54% of games
9.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 43.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
96 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
52 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer