← Search

Nancy Draughon

DURHAM, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
283 matches · 210W–73L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nancy Draughon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history283 matches
W
2026-09-03 · MParker.55C-YMCA · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cheryl Smyth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-28 · NDraughon.55C-YMCA · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diane Werner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-27 · TOC.Powell · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dell Pinkston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-08-21 · NDraughon.55C-YMCA · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wendy Ruffieux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · MParker.55C-YMCA · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-08-13 · MParker.55C-YMCA · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cheryl Smyth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · EHoover-YMCA · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susana Harvey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-06 · MParker.55C-YMCA · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · NDraughon-YMCA · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Philip Sweigart mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · NDraughon-YMCA · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Philip Sweigart mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-07-13 · DAllen.T-DFC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susana Harvey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-07 · CP.Adams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Philip Sweigart mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
87.5%
56W–8L · 64.2% of games
4.0
56.6%
30W–23L · 51.4% of games
6.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 63.9% of games
7.5
74.5%
38W–13L · 56.4% of games
3.5mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 52.9% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 49.5% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 59.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
110 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
96 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
70 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#3 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams