← Search

Sarah Ederle

— year-end
161 matches · 100W–61L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Sarah Ederle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history161 matches
W
Alyssa Burke / Stephanie Jabusch
2026-09-13 · ALynch-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Griffiths
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-10 · LFarber-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Yvonne Acker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-03 · LFarber-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Beth Spinarski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-30 · ALynch-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lizzy Burch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · RDavis-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melissa Fitzpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · ALynch-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ai-Jiuan Wu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-20 · LFarber-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jane Thrailkill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-12 · RDavis-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melissa Fitzpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-09 · ALynch-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Griffiths
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
Suzie Roth / Lisa Dunn
2026-06-24 · MGriffiths-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lizzy Burch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-17 · MGriffiths-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Griffiths
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-13 · JMersereau-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lizzy Burch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
73.4%
47W–17L · 57.7% of games
3.5
41.3%
19W–27L · 46.3% of games
6.5
65%
26W–14L · 57.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
72 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
42 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova