← Search

Shannon Milberg

West Chester, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
116 matches · 99W–17L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Shannon Milberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history116 matches
W
2026-08-09 · #1 Doubles · with Qianhong Wei championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Qianhong Wei championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Qianhong Wei championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Qianhong Wei championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Katie Schalleur championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-10 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Katie Schalleur championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · Tennis Addiction · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · Tennis Addiction · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
Donna Lee / Allison McEvoy
2026-05-29 · Love Me Nots · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexis Bradshaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-05-15 · Love Me Nots · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julia Libke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-12 · Tennis Addiction · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
100%
8W–0L · 71.5% of games
3.0
85.4%
35W–6L · 68.9% of games
3.5
80.8%
21W–5L · 66.9% of games
4.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 62.1% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
29 matches
#1 Singles
23%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
20 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova