← Search

Christine Halbrook

Des Moines, IA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 28W–36L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Christine Halbrook to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
W
2026-07-12 · Willett · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chris David mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-02 · Goode & Bradfield: Genesis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kate Reis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-14 · Willett · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chris David mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-05 · Willett · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert Stinnett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-16 · Lu & Richards: Genesis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susmita Sura
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-04 · Cobb & Richards: Genesis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marie Becker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-24 · Lu & Richards: Genesis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Piscitello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-01-10 · Cobb & Richards: Genesis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sonya Siebert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-09 · Cobb & Richards: Genesis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Kalianov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-12-06 · Lu & Richards: Genesis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Val Hoefle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-11-22 · Cobb & Richards: Genesis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dionne Richards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-01 · Lu & Richards: Genesis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Val Hoefle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
63%
17W–10L · 52.9% of games
3.5
14.3%
3W–18L · 37% of games
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 45.9% of games
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 49.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe