← Search

Claire Baenen

CONROE, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
265 matches · 147W–118L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Claire Baenen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history265 matches
L
2026-08-16 · Cole-Court Crashers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Francis Mayer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-19 · Cole-Court Crashers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Francis Mayer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-28 · Cole-Court Crashers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Francis Mayer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-22 · 6BT-EBERT 40NW TU 18&O SEM F1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Gonte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-17 · 6BT-BARLOW 40NW TH 40&O SEM F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcia Varner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-10 · 3SCWB-HACK 80NW WE 55&O SEM · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marcia Varner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2025-07-10 · 6BT-BARLOW 40NW TH 40&O SEM F3 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcia Varner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2025-07-08 · 6BT-EBERT 40NW TU 18&O SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Nykerk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-07-02 · 3SCWB-HACK 80NW WE 55&O SEM · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marcia Varner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-07-01 · 6BT-EBERT 40NW TU 18&O SEM F1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Gonte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-06-11 · 3SCWB-HACK 80NW WE 55&O SEM · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marcia Varner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-10 · 6BT-EBERT 40NW TU 18&O SEM F1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Gonte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
63.4%
59W–34L · 55.5% of games
4.5
24.1%
7W–22L · 39.2% of games
8.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 55.9% of games
9.0
75%
3W–1L · 53.5% of games
9.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
66.7%
16W–8L · 57.5% of games
9.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
100 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
86 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
65 matches
#1 Singles
5%
13 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova