← Search

Amy Gonte

West Bloomfield, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
396 matches · 191W–205L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Gonte to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history396 matches
W
2026-08-04 · SCWB-Farrell 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joel Cronenwett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Kristin Wikol championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · with Laure Housey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · with Kristin Wikol championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Lisa Ebert championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-20 · FAC- Machus 18s 4.0 DW F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen McDiarmid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · BT- Ebert 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Short
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-09 · DEER-Carlson 40s 4.0 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Ebert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-07 · BT- Ebert 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Ebert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · DEER-Carlson 40s 4.0 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Ebert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-01 · FAC-Bartholomew 40s 4.0 DW F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nisha Jam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-30 · BT- Ebert 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Ebert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams84 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 50% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50%
4W–4L · 54.4% of games
4.0
47.3%
88W–98L · 50.7% of games
4.5
7.7%
2W–24L · 31.4% of games
7.5
75%
12W–4L · 55.9% of games
8.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 43.8% of games
8.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 45.9% of games
0.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
76.2%
16W–5L · 58.2% of games
8.0mixed
62.9%
22W–13L · 55.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
124 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
94 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
87 matches
#1 Singles
15%
60 matches
#2 Singles
6%
23 matches
#3 Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe