Akemi Maebashi
Plymouth, MI
146 matches · 93W–53L · seasons 2021–2025
Captains: add Akemi Maebashi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history146 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
N/A
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2025
3FAC-STEINER 40NW TU 18&O SEM F1
5FAC-STEINER 40NW TH 40&O SEM F3
5FAC-STEINER 9.0 MIXED 40&O SEM
1SCWB-FARRELL Winter Team Singles 4.0 WOMEN SEM F1
2FAC-MILLARD 8.0 MIXED 40&O SEM F2
2FAC-STEINER 18&O MIX 8.0 SEM F3
5SCWB-YUGUCHI 18&O AUG TRI 40,35,30 WOMEN SEM
6FAC-STEINER 18&O TU 40 NW SEM F3
6FAC-STEINER 9.0 MIXED 40&O SEM
6FAC-STEINER JAN TRI-LEVEL 45 40 35 Women SEM
1FAC-STEINER Mixed 40&O 8.0 SEM F3
1FAC-STEINER SEM Tri-Level Showdown W 95 85 75
1HV-COOPER COMBO MIX 18&O 7.5 W/E SEM
1SCWB-FARRELL 4.0W TEAM SINGLES FALL SEM F2
2FAC-STEINER 8.5W COMBO SEM F1
2FAC-STEINER AD40&O 40NW TH SEM F4
2OHCC-KERANEN AD40&O 45NW SEM
2SCWB-FARRELL Team Singles 4.0 Women SEM F1
3FAC-STEINER AD18&O 40NW TU SEM F1
4FAC-STEINER MIX18&O 80 SEM F3
4FAC-STEINER Mixed 40&O 9.0 SEM
4FAC-STEINER TRI-LEVEL W AUG 454035 SEM F1
4SCWB-MOSS SEM Tri-Level Showdown W 75 65 55 f2
6FAC-STEINER 7.5W COMBO SEM F4
6FAC-STEINER MIX18&O 90 SEM
1SCWB-FARRELL 40 W/E WOMEN SINGLES SEM F1
1SCWB-FARRELL Winter 4.0 women singles sem f1
2DET-STEINER 40NW 40&O AD THURS SEM F1
2FAC-STEINER 9.0 mix 40&O SEM
3FAC-MILLARD 8.0 18&O MIXED SEM F3
3FAC-STEINER 45NW 18&O AD WED SEM F2
3FAC-STEINER 85 W/E WOMEN SEM F1
3FAC-STEINER 9.0 18&O MIXED SEM F2
4FAC-JAM 40NW 18&O AD TUES SEM F4
4FAC-STEINER women tri-level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 SEM F1
5FAC-MILLARD 8.0 mix 40&O SEM f2
5SCWB-FARRELL 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F4
FAC-STEINER D1 WE W tri-level showdown SEM
1FAC-MOSS 7.0 40&O Mixed SEM F3
1FAC-MOSS W tri-level 25 30 35 SEM
2DTS-STEINER 40NW 40&O AD THURS SEM F2
2FAC-MOSS 35NW 40&O AD WED SEM F4
3SCWB-GARCIA 8.0 18&O MIXED SEM F4
3SCWB-outside-FARRELL 35NW 18&O AD MON SEM F4
4SCWB-FARRELL 35 W sing sem f2
4SCWB-outside-MOSS 7.0 18&O MIXED SEM F4
5SCWB-GARCIA W tri-level 35 40 45 SEM
MW SEM FAC-MOSS 75 WW COMBO SEM F5
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
100%
9W–0L · 74.1% of games
4.0
63.2%
24W–14L · 55.9% of games
4.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 51.7% of games
9.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 70.9% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 63.6% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
36 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#3 Singles
3%
5 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.