← Search

Ashley Paolangeli

Trumansburg, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 58W–22L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Ashley Paolangeli to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
W
2026-07-22 · Yablonski · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Nelligan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-15 · Yablonski · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rajani Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-01 · Yablonski · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Kaye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · with Madi Maley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Irina Naydich championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-24 · Yablonski · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aija Leiponen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-10 · Yablonski · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · with Seneca Thomas championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Martin Guichardo / Jennifer Cramer
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · with Seneca Thomas championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · with Haiyuan Yu championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-03 · Yablonski · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aija Leiponen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-05-13 · Yablonski · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aija Leiponen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
50%
4W–4L · 51.4% of games
3.0
50%
3W–3L · 54.6% of games
3.5
84%
21W–4L · 63.7% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
15W–5L · 56.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
11 matches
#1 Female Singles
10%
8 matches
#1 Singles
8%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer