← Search

Matthew Baum

— year-end
37 matches · 16W–21L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Matthew Baum to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
L
2026-09-08 · SEyerman (Jeff Adams) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Noel Varughese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-01 · SEyerman (Jeff Adams) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Juan Molano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-18 · SEyerman (Jeff Adams) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sam Eyerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-17 · SEyerman (Jeff Adams) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sam Eyerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-06 · WTiedeman/KGreen (Park Road) · #3 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-15 · WTiedeman/KGreen (Park Road) · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-09 · WTiedeman/KGreen (Park Road) · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-05 · WTiedeman/KGreen (Park Road) · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-04-20 · MBaum (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Adam Tilly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-13 · MBaum (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Adam Tilly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-06 · MBaum (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Adam Tilly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-03-30 · MBaum (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Adam Tilly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 51.2% of games
8.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 42.3% of games
9.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
6 matches
#2 Singles
11%
4 matches
#3 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert