← Search

Keegan Merck

— year-end
43 matches · 27W–16L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Keegan Merck to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
L
2026-09-08 · MJarzynski/BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michael Maio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-01 · MJarzynski/BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tiger Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-30 · MJarzynski/BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michael Maio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-25 · MJarzynski/BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Benjamin Shamanis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-17 · MJarzynski/BShamanis (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Joseph Cochran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-16 · MJarzynski (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luke Mixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-04-20 · MJarzynski (Queens) · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-04-13 · MJarzynski (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nick Gartner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-06 · MJarzynski (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Randall Maddle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-30 · MJarzynski (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nick Gartner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · MJarzynski (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Austin Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-18 · MJarzynski (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nick Gartner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
100%
10W–0L · 65.9% of games
4.5
35.3%
6W–11L · 44.7% of games
8.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 57% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal