← Search

Leticia Schoff

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
274 matches · 143W–131L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Leticia Schoff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history274 matches
L
2026-09-01 · DTC #1 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tina Nathalia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-18 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Prexy Tamayo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-16 · TPC #2 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gary Roeben mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-08-11 · DTC #1 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yarisbel Schieck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-09 · TPC #2 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gary Roeben mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Sydney Collins / Kendall Harris
2026-08-05 · LAS VEGAS CC · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Ruediger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-28 · DTC #1 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tina Nathalia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · TPC #2 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gary Roeben mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · LAS VEGAS CC · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Ruediger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · DTC #1 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Prexy Tamayo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · TPC #2 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gary Roeben mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-08 · LAS VEGAS CC · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Springer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
63.6%
49W–28L · 55.6% of games
3.5
39.3%
24W–37L · 45.7% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
74.1%
20W–7L · 56.9% of games
6.5mixed
50%
8W–8L · 47% of games
7.0mixed
49%
24W–25L · 49.9% of games
7.5mixed
20%
2W–8L · 36.3% of games
8.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
82 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
59 matches
#1 Singles
12%
33 matches
#2 Singles
4%
10 matches
#3 Female Doubles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer