← Search

Kimberly Lukasiak

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
193 matches · 66W–127L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kimberly Lukasiak to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history193 matches
W
2026-09-08 · DTC #3 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with NANCIE WEBSTER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-1
W
2026-09-01 · DTC #3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with NANCIE WEBSTER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-08-25 · DTC #3 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Brinlee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-5
L
2026-08-11 · DTC #3 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natasha Kattau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-28 · DTC #3 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natasha Kattau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-14 · DTC #3 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Brinlee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · DTC #5 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeremy Christensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-19 · DTC #5 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeremy Christensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-03-29 · DTC #5 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeremy Christensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-07 · DTC #3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Brinlee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-21 · DTC #3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Stuart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-14 · DTC #3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Brinlee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 54.9% of games
3.5
40.4%
46W–68L · 47.4% of games
4.0
17.1%
6W–29L · 36.5% of games
6.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 39.7% of games
7.0mixed
23.5%
4W–13L · 44.8% of games
7.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
44 matches
#3 Female Doubles
7%
13 matches
#2 Female Doubles
6%
11 matches
#1 Singles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams