← Search

Donna Stieber

Walnut Creek, CA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
384 matches · 290W–94L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Donna Stieber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history384 matches
L
2026-08-02 · WP NAVY · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Thomas Stieber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-12 · WP NAVY · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Thomas Stieber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-08-04 · TOC.Cuccaro · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hadley Misenheimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-07-21 · TOC.Cuccaro · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hadley Misenheimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-07-17 · TOC.Cuccaro · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hadley Misenheimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-30 · TOC.Cuccaro · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hadley Misenheimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Shannon Berg / Margaret Massey
2025-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Hadley Misenheimer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-06-20 · #4 Doubles · with Hadley Misenheimer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Blair Risinger / Kathy Lynch
2025-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Violaine Romans-Murray championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with Hadley Misenheimer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-09 · TOC.Cuccaro · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hadley Misenheimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-06-02 · TOC.Cuccaro · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hadley Misenheimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.5
86%
147W–24L · 68.2% of games
5.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 44.4% of games
8.5
76.5%
52W–16L · 64.6% of games
9.0
76%
19W–6L · 58.2% of games
9.5
52.6%
10W–9L · 49% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
172 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
110 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
90 matches
#1 Singles
2%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert