← Search

Violaine Romans-Murray

RALEIGH, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
278 matches · 163W–115L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Violaine Romans-Murray to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history278 matches
L
2026-09-03 · ACP.Fish · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Gardner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-27 · ACP.Fish · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cheryl Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-13 · Ji.Darnell18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jeme Avent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Sue Titka / Leslie Morgan
2026-05-15 · Li.Ihly40A · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Felita Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-01 · Li.Ihly40A · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Felita Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · Ji.Darnell18A · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Claire Hying
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-24 · Li.Ihly40A · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Felita Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-22 · Ji.Darnell18A · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hadley Misenheimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-21 · TOC.Darnell · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Felita Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-04-20 · Ji.Darnell18A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gabrielle Shields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-19 · Ji.Darnell18A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Felita Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-04-17 · Li.Ihly40A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jill Darnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
100%
5W–0L · 81.1% of games
4.5
64.3%
83W–46L · 57.6% of games
5.0
20%
1W–4L · 46.2% of games
8.5
68.2%
30W–14L · 58% of games
9.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 39.8% of games
4.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 30.2% of games
9.0mixed
45.7%
16W–19L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
136 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
82 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
39 matches
#2 Singles
4%
11 matches
#1 Singles
3%
9 matches
#3 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer