← Search

Lindsay Castret

— year-end
180 matches · 141W–39L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Lindsay Castret to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history180 matches
W
2026-09-09 · ACP.Rider · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julia Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-09-02 · ACP.Rider · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Molly Andrews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-24 · ACP.Rider · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Molly Andrews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-19 · ACP.Rider · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rebecca Reynolds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-11 · #1 Doubles · with Allison Graves championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · TOC.Rosemeyer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anjaneya Tiwari mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
Barbara Estay / Megan Jones
2026-07-19 · HRoss-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Zoe Dubrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Emily Tinervin / Jennifer Moore
2026-07-13 · TOC.Rider · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Allison Graves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · TOC.Rosemeyer · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anjaneya Tiwari mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · TOC.Rosemeyer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anjaneya Tiwari mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-05 · HRoss-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Tinervin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · TOC.Rider · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Allison Graves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 63.7% of games
3.5
73.7%
14W–5L · 63% of games
4.0
79.5%
31W–8L · 64.9% of games
4.5
95.7%
22W–1L · 62.1% of games
6.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 58.7% of games
7.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 59.3% of games
8.5
100%
8W–0L · 67.3% of games
4.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 45.9% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 59.2% of games
8.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
22 matches
#1 Singles
8%
14 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams