← Search

Casey McKenzie

Tulsa, OK
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
133 matches · 104W–29L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Casey McKenzie to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
W
2026-06-02 · Snapp/LF 18s 4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tammy Been
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-07 · Snapp/LF 18s 4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Renee Haack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-09 · Wilson/LF/4.5W · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Dawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2025-11-17 · Tulsa DAY: Montgomery/LF/4.5DAY · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Natalie Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-11-03 · Wilson/LF/4.5W · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christine Rorabaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-23 · Tulsa DAY: Montgomery/LF/4.5DAY · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Dawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-22 · Haack/LF DAY4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Dawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-10-20 · Wilson/LF/4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kelli Petersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-15 · Haack/LF DAY4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Rorabaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-10-08 · Haack/LF DAY4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Dawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-09-15 · Wilson/LF/4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Faith Beeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-08-13 · Haack/LF 3.5-4.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Dawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 57.6% of games
3.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.9% of games
3.5
77.4%
24W–7L · 59.7% of games
4.0
88.7%
55W–7L · 64.2% of games
4.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 40.2% of games
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 58% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
76 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
19 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe