← Search

Monica Mazzone

— year-end
26 matches · 13W–13L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Monica Mazzone to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
W
2026-07-13 · Queen City Black · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracey DiFalco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Crystal Fenster / Jocelyn Dos Anjos
2026-06-27 · Queen City Bronze · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ming Liao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-06-22 · Queen City Black · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Corinne Lehmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · Queen City Black · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Merri Beth Hebeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
Meredith Cook / Micaela Parson
2026-05-30 · Queen City Bronze · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ming Liao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-06-28 · Queen City Copper · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alicia Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-06-21 · Queen City Copper · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 6-0
L
2025-06-14 · Queen City Copper · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mara Helmuth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-07 · Queen City Copper · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2022-11-01 · Queen City Blue · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maura Satterlee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 2-1
W
2022-10-18 · Queen City Blue · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Danziger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2022-10-11 · Queen City Blue · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Tyger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Teams8 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.2% of games
3.5
41.2%
7W–10L · 40.9% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 58% of the time
#2 Doubles
58%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
3 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe