← Search

Mary Beth Church

Denver, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
256 matches · 154W–102L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Beth Church to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history256 matches
W
2026-08-05 · DTP PINK · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-31 · DTP PINK · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karla Simons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-15 · DTP PINK · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cynthia Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-14 · CACM RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Evashevski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-08 · DTP PINK · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Catherine Calder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-01 · DTP PINK · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bev Morrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-30 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Evashevski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-23 · CACM RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Kiefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-16 · CACM RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Kiefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-02 · CACM RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Ham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-29 · RRTC RED · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carla Ewing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-23 · CACM PINK · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Kiefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
69.4%
43W–19L · 59.4% of games
4.0
44%
11W–14L · 46.6% of games
7.0
84.6%
33W–6L · 60.6% of games
8.0
43.3%
13W–17L · 48.3% of games
7.0mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 59.6% of games
7.5mixed
42.9%
9W–12L · 44.5% of games
8.0mixed
52.6%
10W–9L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
138 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
52 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova