← Search

Andrea Evashevski

Denver, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
195 matches · 77W–118L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Andrea Evashevski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history195 matches
W
2026-08-28 · CACM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Reisbeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-11 · CACM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alecxis Naviaux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-06 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Kiefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-08-04 · CACM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Branch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-16 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Kiefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-14 · CACM RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Beth Church
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-09 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Kiefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-07 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Kiefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-02 · CACM NAVY · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-30 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Beth Church
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-28 · CACM NAVY · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kyle Evashevski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-07 · CACM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kyle Evashevski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
53.5%
23W–20L · 50.1% of games
4.0
29.9%
29W–68L · 43.9% of games
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
48.8%
21W–22L · 50.6% of games
7.5mixed
0%
0W–5L · 28.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
82 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
50 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal