← Search

Courtney Kiefer

Denver, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
216 matches · 81W–135L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Courtney Kiefer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history216 matches
L
2026-08-06 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Evashevski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-30 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-21 · CACM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Reisbeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Evashevski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-09 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Evashevski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-07 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Evashevski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-01 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Harold Kiefer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-23 · CACM RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Beth Church
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · CACM NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eden Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-16 · CACM RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Beth Church
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-14 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kyle Evashevski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-11 · CACM NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eden Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
57.1%
36W–27L · 51.7% of games
4.0
33%
31W–63L · 42.3% of games
7.0mixed
24.4%
10W–31L · 37.9% of games
7.5mixed
20%
3W–12L · 38.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 47% of the time
#2 Doubles
47%
101 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
65 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
50 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova