← Search

Laura Hovanec

— year-end
187 matches · 70W–117L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Laura Hovanec to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history187 matches
L
2026-08-15 · SRTC-Schmidt · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Shimmin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-09 · SRTC-Tabrah · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bettina Magnusen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-19 · SRTC-Tabrah · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelli Melvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · QRRC-Fishman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Valentie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · SRTC-Miller · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tricia Fahrenholz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · SRTC-Tabrah · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sally Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · SRTC-Miller · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rebecca Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · SRTC-Miller · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tracy Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Susan Stewart / Jennifer Frey
2026-06-13 · QRRC-Fishman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Wiedeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-07 · SRTC-Miller · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Humphreville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · QRRC-Fishman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Metzcar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-31 · SRTC-Tabrah · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Monica Sauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
Teams49 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
48.5%
48W–51L · 49.2% of games
4.0
18%
9W–41L · 35.2% of games
6.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 55.3% of games
7.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 43.7% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 39.4% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 30.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
64 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
31 matches
#2 Singles
8%
14 matches
#1 Singles
5%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams