← Search

Katie Humphreville

— year-end
89 matches · 61W–28L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Katie Humphreville to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
W
2026-08-16 · SRTC-Miller · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nicole Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · SRTC-Miller · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · SRTC-Miller · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teresa Siefke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · SRTC-Holbrook · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tricia Fahrenholz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-11 · SRTC-Miller · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Sumner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-27 · SRTC-Miller · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Fahrenholz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-07 · SRTC-Miller · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Hovanec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Sarah Gillis / Sharon Vance
2026-06-06 · SRTC-Miller · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-31 · SRTC-Forster · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Krista Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-30 · SRTC-Holbrook · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Arshia Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
Lisa Sauer / Sarah Richards
2026-05-08 · SRTC-Holbrook · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynn Watkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · SRTC-Schmidt · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samanta Jraisat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Teams25 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 63.2% of games
3.0
88.1%
37W–5L · 66.3% of games
3.5
28.6%
8W–20L · 40.9% of games
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 59.8% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
16 matches
#1 Singles
6%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams