← Search

Tricia Fahrenholz

— year-end
129 matches · 78W–51L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Tricia Fahrenholz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
W
Jennifer Arnett / Rachel Williams
2026-08-16 · SRTC-Miller · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wendi Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-08-09 · SRTC-Miller · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Chillinsky mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-07-12 · SRTC-Miller · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Hovanec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · SRTC-Holbrook · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Humphreville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-11 · SRTC-Miller · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-28 · SRTC-Miller · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Bremar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
Patricia Robinson / Rachel Williams
2026-06-28 · SRTC-Miller · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-27 · SRTC-Miller · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Humphreville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-31 · SRTC-Miller · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Bremar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
Beth Brown / Kelly Scudder
2026-05-30 · SRTC-Miller · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Sumner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-23 · SRTC-Miller · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christy Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-16 · SRTC-Holbrook · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Teams42 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
56.5%
13W–10L · 52.5% of games
3.0
75%
36W–12L · 57.6% of games
3.5
45.2%
14W–17L · 46.2% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 54.4% of games
6.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 57% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 56.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
24 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert