← Search

Henriette Nash

Parker, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
214 matches · 73W–141L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Henriette Nash to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history214 matches
W
2026-08-23 · PRC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jay Griebling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-18 · PRC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jay Griebling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-16 · PRC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jacob Stadelman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-05 · PRC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Birgitte Sandgaard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-04 · PRC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Debartolomeis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-29 · PRC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charlie Ghidotti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-22 · PRC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Manassee Buell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-21 · PRC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karla Davies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · PRC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-09 · PRC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie del Toro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-08 · PRC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charlie Ghidotti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-07 · PRC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liz Holt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
32.6%
45W–93L · 44.6% of games
7.0
36.4%
12W–21L · 46% of games
6.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.3% of games
7.0mixed
30.4%
7W–16L · 44.3% of games
7.5mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 41.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
67 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
57 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams