← Search

Kim Owen

— year-end
46 matches · 20W–26L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Kim Owen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
W
2022-10-17 · Good/CR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Haley Ragsdale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2022-09-26 · Good/CR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Haley Ragsdale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
Kim McGinty / Barbara Smith
2022-09-19 · Good/CR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brenda Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2022-08-29 · Good/CR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brenda Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2022-06-17 · Good/CR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan McKinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-06-13 · Good/CR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kay Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2022-06-06 · Good/CR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liberty Gorospe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2022-05-31 · Good/CR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brenda Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2022-05-16 · Good/CR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brenda Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2021-11-09 · Good/CR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brenda Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2021-11-08 · Good/CR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taylor Toliver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2021-10-04 · Good/CR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brenda Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
Teams6 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
25%
1W–3L · 43.5% of games
3.0
45.2%
19W–23L · 48.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
8 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova