← Search

Diana Engler

Columbia, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
232 matches · 99W–133L · seasons 2016–2026

Captains: add Diana Engler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history232 matches
W
2026-03-31 · JCC- 70's · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kris McDougal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-30 · JCC- 70's · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vanessa Radford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-26 · JCC- 70's · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vanessa Radford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-03-17 · JCC- 70's · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vanessa Radford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-03-16 · JCC Swingers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Monique Bredas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-09 · JCC Swingers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terry Scallon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-26 · JCC- 70's · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kris McDougal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-02-24 · JCC- 70's · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terri Marshburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-23 · JCC Swingers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Polly Whitehorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-16 · JCC Swingers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Popper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2025-07-19 · Engler - 40 Aces 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Dettmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
Susan Homberg / Kimberly Wells
2025-07-12 · Engler - 40 Aces 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Crowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
49%
51W–53L · 50.6% of games
4.0
4.5%
1W–21L · 27.5% of games
7.0
43.8%
32W–41L · 46.9% of games
7.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 52.9% of games
8.0
25%
1W–3L · 39.1% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
106 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
48 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert