← Search

Paula Kelly

— year-end
80 matches · 52W–28L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Paula Kelly to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
L
2026-03-26 · No Drama Llamas 40 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suo Ji
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-16 · Senior Moments · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julia Corty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-03-06 · No Drama Llamas 40 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suo Ji
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-03-05 · No Drama Llamas 40 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Corty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-09 · Senior Moments · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Iselborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-02 · Senior Moments · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Atherton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-30 · No Drama Llamas 40 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sonia Pleasant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-01-19 · Simply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Atherton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-16 · No Drama Llamas 40 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bookie McDonough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-12-29 · Simply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hedy Kurland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2025-12-22 · Simply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vedah Halberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-11-24 · Simply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margo Sackheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Teams9 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
72.7%
24W–9L · 58.1% of games
7.0
63.6%
28W–16L · 56.7% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer