← Search

Julia Corty

— year-end
145 matches · 62W–83L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Julia Corty to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history145 matches
L
2026-05-15 · TCC 3.5 18+ · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gisele Pohoretsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-08 · TCC 3.5 18+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Iselborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-01 · TCC 3.5 18+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheila Hanley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-24 · TCC 3.5 18+ · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Ewing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-17 · TCC 3.5 18+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Iselborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-14 · Laugh Lines · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vedah Halberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-17 · Laugh Lines · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margo Sackheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-16 · Senior Moments · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paula Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-03-06 · No Drama Llamas 40 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Iselborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-05 · No Drama Llamas 40 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-03 · Laugh Lines · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margo Sackheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-02-26 · No Drama Llamas 40 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caryn Barman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
51.8%
29W–27L · 51.2% of games
4.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 40.8% of games
7.0
58.8%
20W–14L · 56.4% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 22.6% of games
7.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 46% of games
8.0mixed
27.6%
8W–21L · 38.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
32 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer